World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the decentralized finance platform backed by President Donald Trump, is navigating a deepening crisis as a precipitous drop in its token price collides with a bitter public dispute involving Tron founder Justin Sun.
The turbulence centers on two distinct but compounding controversies: accusations from Sun that the protocol’s team used centralized “backdoor” mechanisms to freeze his eight-figure investment.
Additionally, the project is facing mounting market anxiety over a highly concentrated, nine-figure borrowing loop executed by the protocol’s team on a decentralized lending platform.
The confluence of these events has wiped out hundreds of millions in market value, dropping the WLFI token to an all-time low of $0.07714 and raising alarms about structural vulnerabilities within the project’s tokenomics.
The architecture of WLFI’s freeze of Sun’s wallet
The public feud reignited over the weekend, when Sun launched a blistering critique on the social media platform X.
In an April 12 post on X, Sun accused World Liberty Financial of embedding hidden smart contract functions to arbitrarily seize investor assets.
He further stated that the WLFI team was treating “the crypto community as a personal ATM” and was engaging in illegitimate actions that “were never authorized by any fair, transparent, or good-faith community governance process.”
Notably, Sun is not a fringe participant in the WLFI ecosystem. He was the project’s largest early external backer, pouring roughly $75 million into WLFI to support what was pitched as a democratized vision for decentralized finance.
However, his wallet was blacklisted by the protocol in September 2025, effectively freezing his assets. Due to the token’s price fluctuations, Sun’s unrealized losses tied to the frozen wallet now exceed $80 million.
In recent statements, the Tron founder characterized the protocol’s governance as “theater,” alleging that the network’s technical structure fundamentally contradicts its decentralized branding.
On April 12, Sun cited on-chain records demonstrating that a single Externally Owned Account (EOA, which also sits on the protocol’s 3-of-5 multisignature wallet) executed the blacklist.
One person—one single individual—has the unilateral power to freeze any token holder’s assets. Seizing those assets requires a 3-of-5 multisig vote, but freezing requires only one signature.
On-chain analysts have largely corroborated Sun’s structural claims.
Pseudonymous Yearn Finance developer Banteg noted that the original WLFI token deployed in September 2024 contained no blacklist functions. The restriction capabilities were introduced via a series of smart contract upgrades in late 2025, nearly a year after Sun’s initial investment.
That timeline is central to Sun’s case because it suggests the most controversial controls were added after early investors had already committed funds.
Banteg also said Sun was placed in a separate vesting category that did not apply to the rest of the investor base.
According to that analysis, WLFI’s multisig configured a 20% initial release for Sun’s allocation, after which he transferred a portion of those tokens out. A guardian then blacklisted his wallet.
In that structure, the power to freeze a holder rested with one address, while broader seizure actions required multiple signers.
WLFI makes legal threats
World Liberty Financial has forcefully pushed back against Sun’s narrative, characterizing his latest public campaign as a diversion to mask his contractual breaches.
On X, the project stated:
“Justin’s favorite move is playing the victim while making baseless allegations to cover up his own misconduct. We have the contracts. We have the evidence. We have the truth. See you in court pal.”
While the protocol has not publicly detailed the exact nature of the alleged misconduct, independent crypto analysts have pieced together the likely catalyst for the September 2025 freeze.
Crypto analyst Quinten François alleged that Sun had transferred a substantial tranche of WLFI to his proprietary crypto exchange, HTX, after receiving his initial 20% token unlock.
The analyst further noted that Sun offered retail investors on HTX high-yield incentives to lock in their newly vested WLFI tokens. Simultaneously, he allegedly liquidated tokens on the exchange’s backend, effectively cashing out his position while using retail deposits as a buffer.
The strategy would, in theory, allow Sun to front-run the market and backfill the exchange’s reserves using his future token unlocks.
In response, World Liberty Financial flagged this activity as a severe breach of the early investor agreement and used the recently upgraded smart contract controls to halt the flow of funds.
A $150 million looping strategy
While legal threats fly between Sun and World Liberty’s executives, everyday retail investors are wrestling with an entirely different existential threat: a massive, highly centralized borrowing scheme that has paralyzed protocol liquidity.
On-chain analytics firm Chaos Labs highlighted the massive concentration of WLFI collateral on Dolomite, an EVM-compatible decentralized lending protocol.
The integration has drawn intense scrutiny, in large part because Dolomite’s co-founder, Corey Caplan, concurrently serves as an advisor and Chief Technology Officer for World Liberty Financial.
According to blockchain data, the World Liberty team has deployed approximately 5 billion WLFI tokens, valued at roughly $400 million and representing nearly 98% of the asset’s supply on Dolomite, across two multisignature wallets.
Against this illiquid collateral, the team has borrowed approximately $150 million in stablecoins, according to Arkham Intelligence data.
Chaos Labs explained that the borrowing utilizes a complex “looping” structure. One wallet borrowed over $40 million in USD1 against 3 billion WLFI. A second wallet borrowed $111 million in USD1 against a mix of WLFI and USDC, then used that USD1 as collateral to borrow an additional $89 million in USDC, cycling the assets to maximize leverage.
Notably, Banteg claimed that one of those wallets is “the same multisig is using 5 billion WLFI as collateral on dolomite to borrow $250 million in stablecoins.”
Meanwhile, the sheer size of the position has functionally monopolized Dolomite’s liquidity pools. Utilization rates for USD1 and USDC skyrocketed to 83.4% and 90.19%, respectively, locking up the platform’s capital and pushing borrowing rates into the 5% range.
Furthermore, the 5 billion WLFI posted as collateral is four times the token’s entire tradable supply on major centralized exchanges, including Binance, the largest crypto exchange by trading volume.
WLFI is still seeing strong speculative interest despite the market fallout
The revelation of the Dolomite loans, coupled with the renewed spectacle of the Justin Sun dispute, has triggered a wave of risk-off behavior.
Data from CryptoSlate showed that the market panic has erased more than $700 million from World Liberty Financial’s market capitalization, dragging the valuation from $3.2 billion down to $2.5 billion in the last seven days.
During this period, the token’s price plunged to an all-time low of $$0.07714 before stabilizing slightly at $0.07965 as of press time.
At the same time, the price action has been brutal for leveraged traders. CoinGlass data shows that the volatility has wiped out more than $4 million in derivative positions since April 10, with the vast majority of liquidations hitting bullish traders attempting to catch the falling knife.
Moreover, industry experts have expressed mounting concern that Dolomite could be saddled with massive bad debt if WLFI’s price continues to slide. If the token drops another 75%, it would hit the liquidation threshold for the team’s massive loans.
Given the token’s thin secondary market liquidity, liquidating $400 million worth of WLFI to recoup $150 million in stablecoins would be mathematically impossible without driving the token price to zero.
Despite the headwinds, derivative metrics suggest speculative interest remains high.
Coinalyze data shows the token’s long-short ratio rising to 1.341, indicating that traders are actively betting on a rebound. Futures volume surged past $540 million over the weekend, marking the highest level of derivative activity since February.
At the same time, World Liberty Financial has also made efforts to quell the FUD by repaying $25 million of the stablecoin debt, thereby lowering utilization rates.
The firm also announced plans to introduce a governance proposal for a phased token unlock for early retail buyers.
Whether those assurances will be enough to calm a market spooked by opaque smart contracts and incestuous DeFi leverage remains to be seen, especially as the specter of a high-profile legal battle looms.
The post World Liberty Financial threatens top token holder with legal action as WLFI loses $700M amid token scandal appeared first on CryptoSlate.
